Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You speak about tiling window managers as if they were already an anachronism in 1985. Yet today, some of us continue to prefer them, and they remain in active development. What good is a window that's partially covered? I either want to completely see it or I want it to be completely hidden from view. The parlor trick of overlapping windows is useless to me.


I constantly use overlapping windows.

If I'm tailing a continuous log, I don't need to see the full text of each line, I just need to see when the pattern changes, which I can get by having the first 10 characters peeking out from behind the left of my active window.

My to-do list is big but really the first three words or so are enough to remind me of what each item is; it's behind and to the left of the tailing log.

Finally, I have a few corners of various other apps I'm using poking out all over the place. It's much easier to switch to the window I want by grabbing a corner than alt-tabbing or any other method.


Fair enough. It's important to have different paradigms for different work styles. You use whatever works best for you. My point was just that tiling WMs were not anachronistic back in '85.


Part of me hopes Windows will rediscover tiling, considering their new-found love for tiles.

In the unlikely event they execute on that I might actually be tempted to try windows again - for the first time in 10 years.


Will this be how Metro works?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: