It looks like a classic case of "guilty until proven otherwise". Arrests should never be made based just on "it may be", but on some solid evidence. It is much safer to make the arrest when the lab confirms the problem, not when there is a hint there may be one.

The data centers in Israel are protected by their AA systems that have more interceptors available than the Emirates. For weeks there are rumors about low stocks of interceptors in the Emirates and Saudi Arabia, while Israel manufactures their own while also getting more from US, so their stocks were probably way higher and replenishment better.

Also the Emirates are in range of short range cheapo drones and Iran build lot of these, while Israel is farther away.

You mean "some women in specific situations", not women in general. 2 weeks ago my cousin's wife and her 2 daughters got in an out for my aunt's funeral, in Ukraine. She is 50 years old, former teacher, no restrictions, the daughters are in the early 20, no restrictions either.

Yes, you’re right. I could have been more specific

I thought it was obvious with the second paragraph

Some countries in the EU, like mine, have funny discrimination laws that say a positive discrimination is not considered a discrimination under the law, so it cannot be challenged. It is used as the basis for all women-favoring regulations.

Such laws are unconstitutional in Germany. I'd be interested in which country you live in and an example of such a law.

This: https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocumentAfis/224130 article 2, paragraph 9. I tells there is no discrimination if you do it under the pretext of improving equality or if it is a positive measure for "disadvantaged groups". A disadvantaged group is any group that is in a position of inequality with the majority, basically anyone rating less than 50%. That was used to define any group the state wanted to provide advantages as "disadvantaged group", even when they were not a minority.

Interesting, this seems to license forms of affirmative action that are unconstitutional in Germany.

Because of the equality implementation.

Because not only that the immigrants have no allegiance to Germany, most have different culture and sometimes incompatible values.

I grew up in the Middle East and I can tell that cultural differences and values were more smooth and compatible than what I saw in Germany. Conscription requires a degree of trust in the people you give guns to and expect to fight on your side in case it is needed, that is mostly not true with immigrants in all times and all countries.

Ten years of "refugees welcome" to fighting age men who we don't trust won't run amok when we go to war with a third party. Very cool.

It is about citizenship, not race.

Cheaper to operate than any fighter, longer endurance, good for patrolling over the Strait. Filling the gap between helicopters and fighters with a big, but cheap cannon.

Observing the color of your comment, you hurt the feelings of many audiophiles. Feelings matter more than facts these days.

I think the problem is what you asked. 90% of time I ask LLMs practical questions about tech, equivalent to Stack Overflow questions, but I did have some discussions about some situations and I asked for information and arguments, not advice. It is my job to act on the information and consider opinions, not the LLM's. In the end, you don't ask people on Stack Overflow to tell you what to do, but you ask for info and options and you decide.

Another problem is believing you have a high emotional intelligence when there is no reliable way to quantify that - similar to "I believe I am very tall, but I don't know how tall I am and how tall are the others because there is no unit of measure for height", with the difference that for emotional intelligence there is no unit of measure and no correlation that can be established with anything to make at least an indirect measurement.