Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Lapra's commentslogin

> Americans can delete Italy.

Boy, Americans really do have an overinflated sense of their power.


There are american military bases all over italy already...


What would actually happen?


French nukes would happen.


Mutually assured destruction is still a thing.

These hypotheticals aren't helpful though.


Exactly. That's what protects the EU from this scenario.


It limits both sides involved in a conflict from using nuclear weapons first.

As history has clearly shown, it doesn't do much to prevent conventional wars, especially involving third parties.

I don't think anyone in power truly believes that France would actually use nuclear weapons to protect Italy during a conventional war against a nuclear power when France itself isn't in danger - let alone in a war Italy started. That's a no-win scenario for France.


Italy isn't a third party. They're both EU states. French nuclear doctrine is specifically the only one with nuclear first strikes as response to conventional threats.


If push comes to shove, I believe France is incredibly unlikely to actually attack the US with nuclear weapons regardless of what happens to Italy.

Doctrines and policies are meaningless under pressure. Would France risk global nuclear armageddon and the near-extinction of humanity for Italy? Almost certainly not, regardless of what their "doctrine" says.


If the US attacks Italy, humanity is already lost.


Fully agreed. We are just discussing hypotheticals.


They are a third party. The EU isn't a country, it's an association and it's clear that solitary between member countries only goes so far.

We saw what happened when France triggered the mutual defense clause in the EU charter after the terrorist attacked. Even when they all but begged other EU states to help them, they were rebuffed.

There's little reason to believe France would behave any differently if the roles had been reversed in the especially if there was any real risk to themselves if they got involved.


The EU isn't an association, it's a Union.


So their "fix" was to have an artist do a quick paint-over to remove the most egregious artifacts. Is that... actually any better? Just hire artists to make the damn paintings in the first place.


Steam is a service that's been running for >20 years and somehow hasn't been enshittified (although, I suppose when it first appeared it was seen as enshittification). It's worth celebrating, to be honest.


I can personally vouch for a great deal of consternation among players of Valve's games at the time of Steam's launch and I have the IRC logs to prove it!

I was also personally resistant to the new thing and to this day have "only" a five digit Steam ID rather than maybe a four or even three digit one.. Haha!

Since then I can say that PC gamers have only benefited greatly from Valve's benevolent dictatorship compared to the alternatives.


I'll counter your cherrypick with my own:

Dr. Olivia Guest, Assistant Professor of Computational Cognitive Science

Dr. Abeba Birhane, Assistant Professor of AI

Prof. Iris van Rooij, Professor of Computational Cognitive Science

Prof. Dr. Dagmar Monett, Director of Computer Science Dept., Professor of Computer Science (AI, Software Engineering)

Dr. Alex Hanna, Director of Research, DAIR

Roel Dobbe, Assistant Professor of Public Interest AI and Algorithmic Systems

Dr. Mark Blokpoel, Assistant Professor of Computational Cognitive Science

Dr. Dan McQuillan, Senior Lecturer in Critical AI

Dr. Ronald de Haan, Assistant professor of Artificial Intelligence

Joost Vossers, PhD Candidate on Artificial Intelligence

Dr Esther Mondragón, Senior Lecturer in Artificial Intelligence

Prof Eduardo Alonso, Professor of Artificial Intelligence

Dr. Andrea E. Martin, Research Group Leader, Language and Computation in Neural System

Dr. ir. Gabriel Bucur, Assistant Professor in Statistical Machine Learning and Explainable AI for Health

Prof. M. Dingemanse, Professor of Language and Communication & cofounder, EU Open Source AI Index

All of these people definitely stand to very much directly benefit from AI hype.


The first two people you mentioned co-wrote a paper titled "Towards decolonising computational sciences" and certainly anyone at DAIR would also be in that ideological cluster. I don't think an absolute majority of the signatories have those sorts of associations, but a good many do. What's puzzling me is why so many are Dutch?


From the first two of your cherrypicks' web pages:

I am committed to [...] the broader decolonisation of cognitive and computational sciences. My research interests comprise (meta)theoretical, critical, and radical perspectives on the neuro-, computational, and cognitive sciences broadly construed.

and

Central to my research is challenging and dismantling societal and historical inequalities and power asymmetries; holding responsible bodies accountable; and paving the way for a future marked by just and equitable AI systems that work for all.

Notice a theme?


I'm sorry, what? If you're a voting member, then yes I //do// expect you to read all the candidate statements. That's the least you can do to be actually informed about your decision. The laziness on display - even being bragged about here - is astonishing. If you don't have the time to be informed about your decision, then there's always the other option - not voting.


I just want to buy a product and not have it constantly upsell me. Like what Affinity was before. Please.


But how will the company “maximize shareholder value” then?


They are a porn company now, after all.


Perhaps this was the reason behind the move.


In the same sense in which Google is a porn aggregator company because it will return porn results when you ask for them?


OpenAI will now generate porn for you, Google doesn't


If you read what I wrote carefully, you'll not that I used "porn aggregator" not just "porn site" and not even "porn generator"


Well openAI will not be a porn aggregator, they'll be a porn producer, so not sure your point


huh? What did I miss?


"Sam Altman says ChatGPT will soon sext with verified adults"

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45582874


"ChatGPT will soon allow erotica for verified adults, says OpenAI boss" https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpd2qv58yl5o


This would destroy the goodwill that they've built up as a public good. People generally don't mind you archiving their content, but if you're selling access to that data, they aren't going to stand for it.


I recently read the book "Invisible Friends," and in it, among other things, the author does go on to explain that it's theorised that many skin infections come from a lack of biodiversity in a persons' skin microbiome, because the "good" or neutral microbes compete with the "bad" for resources. Supposedly people who share a house together often have similar gut microbiomes, too.

So yeah, I don't know. I think you have a point here.


Even $5k/year seems insane to me for hosting what is essentially an IRC channel...


Just IRC with

- a decent mobile client that uses the same account - and decent notification system - a backlog that survives disconnects - a search - file and media uploads that actually work behind NAT, and also persist - markdown

But yes, certainly Slack isn't the only option here.


With file hosting. Which can occupy a lot of storage, but yeah, pricing is still insane.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: