I guess we collectively forgot how idf used to kill Palestinians using autonomous mounted guns, illegally take over houses of Palestinians, rape people while raiding looting thier house(pardoned by court later on) and kill civilians without oversight.

Please explain why the hundreds of people at the concert deserved to be killed.

Please explain why Hamas needed to parade the body of the young Germany woman they murdered like a hunting trophy?

How do these actions help achieve Hamas goals? Unless their goals are really just killing as many Israelis as possible. Hamas is basically a less ambitious ISIS

> It is a fact that the number of ballistic missiles Iran is capable of launching had fallen sharply

Yesterday night, Iran was able to hit multiple targets in Tel Aviv including rail infrastructure, a factory and a few buildings. They reportedly launched around 300 missiles almost on par with what they launched in Feb but with more direct hits.

> Therefore even in the unlikely event of an Israeli interceptor crisis, the situation is rather favorable to Israel

Most of the missiles were destroyed by interceptors. If they run out, we will be looking at huge casualties and infra damage within few days.

> interoperates with other products that don't exist yet.

Are you claiming no other wireless earphones exist other than apples'??

That would implement Apple's proprietary protocol. He thinks Europe would think Apple is creating a monopoly for themselves for iPhone headphones since no other company could implement the protocol without Apple's approval.

iPhones work with any BT headphones.

But other BT headphone manufacturers wouldn't be able to get the ultra low latency / sound quality / perfect device switching / etc.

What I have observed is, if you don't know what the issue is, llm would usually suggest something that is unnecessarily complex and not ideal.

It might work but the moment something fails, llm suggest hacks instead of solution.

US and Israel killed more civilians in war last year than Iran in decades. So by that logic, US and Israeli terrorists must be terminated?

Well, just in the past two months, iran is thought to have killed more than 30,000 of its own citizens, while the whole civilian death toll in gaza is about 40k or less over more than two years (out of roughly 70k killed), so i'd say you just made that up.

Demographics: Approximately 70% of the 70k verified fatalities are women and children. International observers, including the OHCHR, have noted that children alone account for roughly 33-44% of the death toll.

Your information is false and out of date.

You better take it up with Gemini then. This is just a straight fact check.

This is the latest information on Gaza casualties. As you can see, there's a disproportionate number of fighting age male casualties. https://x.com/GabrielEpsteinX/status/2024527393226936441/pho...

> That's a massive, silent redistribution of discovery

Until chatgpt integrate ads into their results

Did you miss the part where they were not able to verify any of these claims?

Bank tellers are deterministic though. They have a set protocol for each cases and escalate unknown cases to a more deterministic point of contact.

It will be difficult to incorporate relative access or restrictions to features with respect to users current/known state or actions. Might as well write the entire web app at that point.

I think the bank teller's systems and processes are deterministic, but the teller itself is not. They could even rob the bank, if they wanted to. They could shoot the customers. They don't, generally, but they can.

I think, if we can efficiently capture a way to "make" LLMs conform to a set of processes, you can cut out the app and just let the LLM do it. I don't think this makes any sense for maybe the next decade, but perhaps at some point it will. And, in such time, software engineering will no longer exist.

The actual app is the set of processes.

All these comments look like advertisement. "uv is better than python!!", "8/10 programmers recommend uv", "I was a terrible programmer before but uv changed my life!!", "uv is fast!!!"

> All these comments look like advertisement. "uv is better than python!!", "8/10 programmers recommend uv", "I was a terrible programmer before but uv changed my life!!", "uv is fast!!!"

Have you tried uv?

Why would I? Does it offer something that standard python tools doesn't? Why uv over, lets say, conda?

FWIW I asked the same question last time a uv thread was posted (two weeks ago) - got some legit answers, none that swayed me personally but I can see why people use it. Also lots of inexplicable love for it https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45574550

I agree that the speed improvements are inexplicable, as in I can't convince you in writing. "uv is fast!!!" doesn't do it justice. You kinda just have to experience it for yourself.

If you haven't spent 5 minutes trying it out, you don't know what you're missing.

If you're worried about getting addicted like everyone else, I could see that as a valid reason to never try it in the first place.

> Does it offer something that standard python tools doesn't?

Other than speed and consolidation, pip, pipx, hatch, virtualenv, and pyenv together roughly do the job (though pyenv itself isn’t a standard python tool.)

> Why uv over, lets say, conda?

Support for Python standard packaging specifications and consequently also easier integration with other tools that leverage them, whether standard or third party.

Maybe open hundreds of threads praising uv to find what was answered thousand of times?