Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | behrlich's commentslogin

I think so! You independently stumbled upon the "China brain" thought experiment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_brain - is "the nation of china simulating a brain" conscious?


From this and Searle's "Chinese room" at least we know for sure that any conscious entity of this type must speak Chinese.


Do Chinese people call it the English room experiment?


https://github.com/ehrlich-b/wingthing - Here's my version of this idea which is agent agnostic. Not exactly the same idea, "sandbox'ed persistent agent", in my case available over the web with xterm.js (though you can also just run locally).


This looks very cool! My concern is just that it's a lot of things bundled in one and I kind of have to trust you for all of them. I would prefer something that puts together a stack of better known components, like a docker compose of agent-sandbox and tailscale or something equivalent, etc ... ideally with each of those swappable.


Looks cool! What's a roost? Is that just a name for the server to go with the whole egg analogy some technology that I haven't heard of before?


https://github.com/ehrlich-b/wingthing Here’s my take on this idea, also FOSS. Does tmux style sessions so you can come and go. It also exposes a web terminal so you can get remote access - but you can also run fully locally for less latency.


I've been working on a similar idea to the "claws" but rather than integrating with messaging apps, just make the TUI available e2e encrypted where-ever you are. https://wingthing.ai/ / https://github.com/ehrlich-b/wingthing

I've been thinking about how docker support would work, so I'll check this out!


I had sort of the same idea. https://wingthing.ai/ This idea started at “sandbox” and worked its way toward “remote access”. But same thoughts about muxing sessions. Love being able to leave and reattach while an agent is working. I’ll give yours a shot!


Would love your feedback and suggestions!


Max user: Also can't see 4.6 and can't set it in claude code. I see it in the model selector in the browser.

Edit: I am now in - just needed to wait.


"/model claude-sonnet-4-6" works


Hey, sorry I missed your comment - it can be self hosted. Both the cinch worker and cinch server are self hostable. For my projects I run a cinch worker on my local machine, and the cinch server (which receives webhooks) runs on cinch.sh. But, again, you could self-host the cinch.sh webhook receiver portion.

RE: Makefile. The point is that the runner just runs a command - meaning the CI doesn't have an opinion on what that command should be. All my projects use make - but you could just run `go build` instead! The cinch yaml typically has two keys - the build command and the release command, that's it.


https://github.com/anderspitman/awesome-tunneling - for anyone interested in the landscape of tunneling tools like this.


> I designed Bedrock to make it easier to maintain programs as a solo developer.

Can you say more? I really love this idea but can’t think of any practical use case with 65k of memory. What programs are you now more easily maintaining with Bedrock? To what end?


Check out Uxn for some "practical" use cases: https://github.com/hundredrabbits/awesome-uxn


I'm currently selling a pixel-art drawing program called Cobalt, which is built on Bedrock (you can see a demo of it running at the bottom of the project page). It was initially only available for Windows and Linux, but I wanted to make it available for the Nintendo DS as well, so I wrote a new emulator and now it and all of my other programs work on the DS. It was far easier to write the emulator than it would have been to figure out how to port Cobalt to the DS directly, and now I don't have the issue of having to maintain two versions of the same software.

It's true that 64KB is pretty small in modern terms, but it feels massive when you're writing programs for Bedrock, and the interfaces exposed by Bedrock for accessing files and drawing to the screen and the likes make for very compact programs.


It’s true you can’t build giant video editors or even photo editors. But, if you reestablish your expectations and think 8-bit retro, you’ll be reminded that very few things didn’t exist in some form in the 80s… just at a smaller scale. Spreadsheet? Check. Paint programs? Check. Music composition? Check.


> completely obsessed with the project, like it’s their main hobby/purpose

I think you figured it out.


If your main hobby or purpose is to make someone else rich you're a slave.


So only if you're hating your job then you are a bastion of free will and free thinking among us mortal capitalist slaves?

What about truly enjoying your job and getting paid handsomely for it (compared to almost all other jobs) being sufficient to one's happiness?

Also, if you don't realise that being the one running the show is orders of magnitude harder than following the lead and doing your stuff then you never really done it before. Having ALL the control has advantages and many less obvious disadvantages.


Imagine taking pride in your craft rather than doing only the bare minimum to pad your ego, what a crazy approach!


Taking pride in your craft would mean having enough self-respect to both not burn your soul out for the sake of a corporation that wants to make you redundant and using it in a direction that directly benefits you.

I've been in the industry long enough now to see those 10x engineers having pride in their work get their mindset shattered because John from financials thinks they can juice the next quarter by laying them off.

If you want to have pride in your work as a supposed 10x engineer, work at 2x or 3x and save the remaining for yourself.


A lot of commenters seem not to work with very skilled individuals.

One (engineer-turned) manager I have in mind: show up at 10am, leave at 4pm, solve a zillion hard problems in the mean time. Are they 10x? If they save me 2 weeks of work with their insight then I guess I have to admit yes.


Why, though?

Lots of people are happy to just do whatever, go home and not work on personal projects. Plenty of people here defend it.

Why should productive engineers change their habits just not to be called a sucker?


Save it for myself how, ditch half the work day to go to the gym? I'm going to work 9-5 either way.


Exactly, I'm not saying do the bare minimum

I mean more that the optimal amount of work to put in is still above average but way below 10x


I worked like this. You could have phrased it better.


If you're not making someone with a lot more money than you even richer you're probably not earning much yourself.

This is about how capitalism is structured it's not at all a matter of personal choice.


That honestly doesn't matter if you (no longer) pursue riches yourself, have enough already and enjoy your hobbies. Besides, not everyone working in IT is working in a chique billionarie mill. A lot of IT is just plumbing. Majority even.


if you also make yourself rich in the process, are you still a slave?


I'd love to hear your take on those dumbass medical research scientist slaves who haven't figured out life. Probably wasting their time looking for cures, when they could be starting their own crypto or podcast or innovation-firm instead.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: