"I imagine it asking you who you are in a heavy Slavic accent before firing its many weapons into your fleeing body."

I find this ... part of a paragraph, highly unnecessary continuation of the previous sentence! And I {object (to this! it = Slavic}; my accent is (fine; (fuck you too = _Writer_; ... i ment...; ...; Nevermind! [:Reader])!

Yeah... fuck your wars, I aint hating Americans for that, and I ain't "pulling out a gun" { missing word -> due to rising _(<<anger-ining>>)_ feelings or something...; Fuck you = _Reader_??!$!$> $T@$ @$) ) )!# _ }; fuck fuck fuck you!...

edit: in-before: whatever: I don't care about points, and this is not a language, this is just a fuck off to the OW {Original Writer}; of the article; Fuck _off_; ... yeah.. fuck you... I'm fine... k... bye

Is this perl?

No, this is jhet :)

jhet is; A language utility; that I develop; .

jhet is A language utility { that I develop }; .

~ jhet is A language utility that I { develop | create | screw around...} .

~ jhet is PROBABLY a language {Some Kind of English, but not the same... read -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bracket#Curly_brackets -> It's basically BRACKETs { of the ENGLIH lagn } that is/would be; !#@ %R whatever... I am showing it off right now may be for the first time..

~ jhet is a language utility; (that would help you); (if it existed {but it's not}); with Languages; Kinda like DrRacket... So JHET would be (may be) some kind of SLANG for RACKET { in DrRacket };... yeah, complimentary to the Racket whatever { "it" may be}... Just __imagine__ YOU'RE INA STRING {of data}

~ The Language:: Language:: The language has a working name as Charm {as in SPELL-cast-ing | _goofy_ I know, but its a good name! yeh... }

~ Todo: jhet { "jhet" is just a word-hack right now... a w-rack if you will :P

Term: To wrack IS To hack words. Word-Hack

I think you broke him, Maciej.

"is"-ness is a strong word.

~ ISness is bad word :you { skip (Subject| Object | RelationSHIP { a type of Predicate!} ++ "like"}; that; just read <<jhet>>isson; all meaning ...

~ You can form a better Sentence including the word "perl"

For instance: Is this "like" Perl Is this "like" Perl in what ways ~ Fuc@ $ @ $@$@$! %(!#(%!*#%!&%#&!_# )U! <<This part is retracted|has been edited with 'cut' operation>> k your Ego _Reader_, it doesn't matter { 'cus. It's just boundaries { between Person-als }... } ... so on... someone; close the door; "SLAVIC" idiom in English; някой да затвори вратата; <- this was a word in SLAVIC... ... ego is still angry at ME... Ego... SHUT THE GELL UP.. HELL IP UP... Shut the Fuck up; ... brainstate: normal; meme:: The Terminator mblabla bla

~

~

edit: I will re-edit this, upon request :P Have a good time Reader, This wave of thinking-outloud-advertising-response-to-insults-is-done-

Count thy Scores! The Game is ON

~ No, it's not on...

~ Everything under the TILDE can be DISREGARDED as meaningful and malformed but By god { if it exists }; those are {were?} my Honest Words on this Topic -> War Tech.

>There is, it's the downvote button. The distinction of why a downvote is useless.

How about a tag system associated with each posting? Then you can have just a scalar "weight" and a set of keywords (string labels), each with a designated meaning. You press a "plus" button or something, and a menu with optional tagging pops up (tag clouds can be used).

Some tags could be "spam", others could be "didn't read" and users can build their own threshold filters for tags. (0) spam; (4) didn't read; (3) incomplete; ...

I've thought about this, too. In particular, I'd like to, say, separately up vote "substantive" and down vote "agree". That said, how complex do we really want the UX to be?

As for "didn't read", if you're not interested, just move on. If you think the article is inappropriate and can, flag and move on. If you see a comment that looks like the poster didn't read the article, you can call civilly call out what is in the article, and perhaps down vote the comment.

> how complex?

Yeah I thought about this very hard actually, and came to the conclusion that just a "weight"(+) button is enough.

And, if you care that much so that you would waste your time providing more ... contextual meta-info (about the weight itself), you simply need a pop-up and a quick way to select words from a common dictionary. Certain users can even make content "more spammish" by simply increasing the weight with a click (they agree with the labeling and they are "special" in some way).

This, and the weight itself should provide enough info for a comprehensive "decoration" of the postings.

So... slashdot?

Mmm, to be honest, I was never a slashdotter so I have no experience with it at all (strangely enough :))

It has/had exactly that system but with also positive descriptors.

I can't fault you - slashdot hasn't been relevant for.. at least a decade.

I "invented" a dispatcher library back then for that. Marking and matching callbacks with strings and looping through in the proc [ was very proud with it :-) ]

It was very funny making Dialogs with a randomly moving "OK" button responding on WM_MOUSEOVER (or something like it). Make them bigger, toolboxes, always on-top, and disable the top-right "x" button. Fun times :P

On discovering that buttons and other controls were just different classes of windows, I wrote a few little games that took advantage of it to spawn moving buttons, checkboxes, and other widgets. Their sources and binaries are probably still somewhere, but not currently on this computer. Incidentally, I believe Minesweeper also does the same with its grid --- they're just buttons.

Sorry for the text. Here is [my posting](http://www.reddit.com/r/offmychest/comments/35jxw4/the_votin...) on reddit.com, and I am prepared for the consequences of my karmic_resolution_actions <3

>.. aim diagonally at the wall.

Although Germans had some of the best tanks in WW2 they still hadn't figured simple trick of slope armor... (I am sorry I couldn't resist)

Sorry But I will recapture his thinking here:

    * Try to be explicit { rather than implicit }
    * Carefully consider inlining { large blocks of code }
    * Do not use static initializers { for infrequency or trivialities }

Something TO HACK and to DEVELOP YOUR minds WITH

I do not feel the shame of self-promotion, thank you for not annoying me with downvotes, much like Reddit.

Goodbye, Hacker-News, It's been a blast with you. I am not going to post anything else here, expect only comments. Sometimes, when you care for something or someplace, I think, it is normal to react with EMOTION. Emotion is the key feeling of Desire (or Lust), and is the driving force behind "attraction" and "dis-traction" of everything, therefore, My emotions here (if you can detect any) are dry, and it's time to move on, for me.... Ki..

Something to ponder WHICH exactly COVERS your idea of hacking:

Himuretsu (The Speach of the String, {for remembering passwords, and other shit for instance):

http://imgur.com/a/avNvd = http...-tsu-ki'o'co'mo ai-sla-tsuki-ai-vai-Ni-tsu-vai-do-ka

Goodbuy.

Yep, I am hiring...

Text me at dekaroffskye ona gmail com(pany)