Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | boppo1's commentslogin

>particularly high profile example would be the plot to kidnap a state governor a few years ago.

iirc that was something more than infiltration. The FBI found an extremist loser who lived in a basement, egged him on, helped him network & gave him resources. Without them, he probably would have been thinking really hard about it, not much more.



Munger's Law - Agents know they'll never get recognition or promotions by rounding up hothead wannabes.

Can you say more?

New to webdev, coming from graphics:

What is better than react? I started with direct dom manipulation and it was a nightmare for making a 'modern' experience.


Eh, I stuck it in a docker container with pass-thru to my repo directory and I feel pretty safe about letting it fly.

Then again I dont work on anything serious.


I've been using 5.2 a lot lately but hit my quota for the first time (and will probably continue to hit it most weeks) so I shelled out for claude code. What differences do you notice? Any 'metagame' that would be helpful?


I just use Cursor because I can pick any mode. The difference is hard to say exactly, Opus seems good but 5.2 seems smarter on the tasks I tried. Or possibly I just "trust" it more. I tend to use high or extra high reasoning.


>I could spend an hour and have a full setup done on physical or VPS to have 1) remote git hosting 2) pipelines running on changes 3) pipelines publishing images or some artifacts 4) automated deployment for these images/artifacts

This sounds like a week or two of work to me (I'm a novice though). You should write a guide.


Blender does it


lol Adam Smith called this. The Wealth of Nations is all about how nominal increases in how the rich measure their wealth aren't really 'good economy', it's the goods and services and upward economic mobility everyday people have access to


I want to know how much of my porn habits reddit/fb/google/whoever keep on file.


Every load, and more.


I'm very open about sex and art and I am offended by the censorship in models, but my reading of that line is more with chatgpt. But idk Shakespeare at all. Can you elaborate on how he's definitely describing semen on her?


I've studied and taught Shakespeare, and been professionally acquainted with Shakespeare scholars whose names (at least) other Shakespeare scholars know. That's an... eccentric reading. There's no "definitely" in literature, of course, and GP's reading can be made to work.

If I were to try to defend it in an academic setting I'd be looking for how securely or inevitably "groan" is used as a synecdoche for orgasm (I can think of at least three instances in Shakespeare where it doesn't, and off the top of my head no others where it does), and for other period instances where the neck is eroticized as a site of ejaculation (I am not aware of any).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: