Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | cheetahtech's commentslogin

Entrepreneur on Fire has been very vocal about their income reports. Making over 200k a month.

Its a pretty good podcast as well.


What type of things were found via this api?


Pretty sure all the things on this [1] page that have a checkmark in the "Public" column

[1] http://developer.espn.com/docs


This should be pushed over to swintonreport.com. Not to push it as a site, but it does carry this type of pertinent information.


Does anyone have access to the PowerPoint described in this study for the in depth 5 hour course they took? I would like to see what exact foods were suggested to both eat and stay away from.

Thanks


Stop diagramming an just jump into the code...


Knowing what I'm building (as much as possible) before I start building produces better (more stable/flexible) code. I wouldn't suggest trying to build a foundation w/out knowing what's going on top of it


Was with a advanced DoD company who was using this app to push the boundaries in the field for communications without walkie talkies or sat phones. The app worked extremely well and we were happy to win a contract based on what this app did for us and we built up from there.


Maybe throw a few coins or lines of code to the Serval guys then? They are a great team and have done some great work.


I have totally converted to OSM with my startups.

We use it soley for all our mapping needs and it does quite well.

See it in action: https://rdnation.com/roller-derby-leagues


Some 'null's show through for one of the teams in New Jersey.


Attribution...


I really don't understand. Why resign, but rather fix the issues within.


Crypto currencies are all about high decentralization. As time goes on, more and more people involved in Bitcoin realize the assignment of power to a central 'authority' is perceived to be a 'very bad thing' as it relates to direction and consensus building within the market.

Simply put, the foundation shouldn't exists in its current form. A handful of Bitcoin entrepreneurs doesn't represent the interests of ALL MANKIND'S need for various levels of computed trust. In effect, a foundation's job would simply be pushing a PR agenda for the movement. You don't need to waste effort or, more importantly, time in electing a board to go hire a PR firm.

My plan is to put together a basic marketing plan, go peddle it to a few top PR firms, and then let them take it and run with it. Because it's Bitcoin, the marketing campaign can be crowdsourced, even to the point the ads themselves contain QR codes for keeping the ads running. Imagine a Bart splash campaign at all the stations, with QR codes to track the funding and length of time they run. You could check on the funds and donate if you wanted to keep it going.

Anyway, it's all about marketing in the new economy. We don't need a foundation. We need traditional marketing and, frankly, some crisis marketing thrown in for good measure.


As long as Gavin holds the key to the 'panic button' for the entire network (which I don't think is necessarily the worst choice), he will have slightly more power over the direction of bitcoin than anyone else.


What exactly is the panic button? Google didn't yield answers to that question


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Andresen

It's a key built in to the network that essentially gives him the power to broadcast a special alert signal to the network. I'm not actually sure if most clients are equipped to interpret these signals now, though.

http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/583/what-is-the-a...

edit: I should clarify it's built into the original satoshi client, not necessarily 'the network' and certainly not the blockchain. Someone on bitcointalk explained it as "part of the peer to peer overlay and not part of the blockchain. You can find this public key in the source code of the official client if you look."


I don't think he is the only one with the private key


So, in other words, you're creating another group with you at the top, pushing your PR agenda for the movement.

I fail to see the difference, other than the fact that you're doing it instead of those people.


Nice to meet you, but please don't speak for me.

This is what I said:

> and then let them take it and run with it...the marketing campaign can be crowdsourced

Marketing will get done regardless of whether there is someone at the top or not. I didn't rant on in my post about decentralization of power just to put myself or someone else at the top. I'm talking about taking a methodology of raising interest and making it a global effort.

Whether that can be done or not is TBD, but I'm going to give it a whirl and see what happens.


Decentralized crisis marketing? I'd be surprised if anyone can pull that off.


Crisis marketing is just regular marketing with intent. I agree that it will be difficult to build a distributed marketing campaign, but that's why the ad people need to be on it.


That's what this election was supposed to be about - fixing the issue of people with checkered backgrounds leading the Foundation. Clearly it failed, and people are rightly exasperated with it.


I would add two more things.

Im highly moderated to the point of killing users voices.

Politically selfish when it comes to talking about YCombinator. (Politics is alright, as long as YCombinator is doing it)


Just read something else he pushed.

He used some pretty strong words against the politicians.

Call Hillary a Neocon and corrupted, but he guesses she will win the next election. Page 5. http://www.gq.com/news-politics/newsmakers/201406/glenn-gree...


Hillary was considered a shoe-in for Dem Pres nominee in 2008 as late as Jan '08, 11 mo before the 2008 election. Keep your speculation in perspective.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: