Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | everettForth's commentslogin

The Senate is going to meet May 31st to prevent the shut down from happening. This was their most successful vote on Saturday. 57 out of 60 votes needed. http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/114/senate/1/194

Notice all Democrat Senators voted for it. They are going to spend all this week trying to bring over 3 more Senators by offering to add amendments to the bill.

The time to act is now, not May 31st minutes before the vote. Does anyone know how to reach out to Senators and let them know that we want them to let section 215 of the Patriot Act to expire, and not to vote for USA Freedom Act simply because a few new amendments might be added in the next week?


All the Democrat Senators voted in favor. Why do the Democrats want NSA bulk spying?http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/114/senate/1/194


Because that was the Democrat approach (USA FREEDOM Act) to doing this. Most of the Democrats naturally voted against the Republican approach:

http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/114/senate/1/195

It's less about policy than politics, as you'd probably expect.


That was simply a vote to extend the current program by two months:

"That was immediately followed by rejection of a two-month extension to the existing programs. The vote was 45-54, again short of the 60-vote threshold."

I think it's pretty clear the policy was they don't want an extension of the Patriot Act, which I think is a good thing. I also think there is a lot of confusion here, everything I've read about the USA Freedom Act seems pretty sensible and addresses privacy concerns. It completely changes how the NSA could gain access to phone records and bears no resemblance to the blanket powers the Patriot Act allowed.


I'm not sure, but it remains a pretty strong indicator of why we need good multipartisan cooperation in any good society.


Hey, everyone that voted for one of these Democratic bozos... you should take a moment to email your senator.


Here's a live webcast of the senate floor. http://www.senate.gov/floor/


Anyone got a VLC stream?


Same as someone linked in a previous thread; mms://207.7.154.95/G1075_002?wmcache=0

thx linux dude that posted the original!


The Senate is holding an unusual weekend vote tomorrow to extend section 215 of the Patriot Act 2 more months. If that vote fails, NSA bulk spying on U.S. citizens is illegal on June 1st.

Here's how senators have voted in the past. http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/patriot-act-reauthor...


It's already illegal! The NSA reasoning behind their collection is, IMHO, a legal fiction.


This is all assuming that we don't have a space elevator.

tldr; it costs a lot of money to launch mass into space.

Sending 1 pound of water into space costs $50,000. This is more than the price of gold on earth. A space elevator changes the economics dramatically.


No, this is about the speed of the earth relative to the sun. E.g. even if we wanted to shoot, say, the ISS into the sun, it'd be hard. As soon as you point it towards the sun it will go into an elliptical orbit.


A space elevator takes care of a portion of the earth escape velocity, still leaving >20 km/s left once you get to the top.


For me, this was a key part of the sides:

"Goal: Automated conversion of our C code to Go. Target: our C code, not all C code."


People are talking about how updating the date isn't legal unless something copyrightable has changed.

I'm not a lawyer, but I've been in meetings where management decided the year needs to update, so that's when I started using this snippet:

in ruby html.erb: <%= Time.now.year %>


Too bad it looks like congress dropped this amendment that passed with an overwhelming majority in a backdoor deal over the past 48 hours: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8703331


The question reminded me of this classic: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2009/05/18/ruby-on-rails-...


Bitcoin has some limitations with microfinancing.

1. Transaction times are long (6 blocks to confirm)

2. Transaction Fees of 0.0001 BTC could likely incur for transactions smaller than 0.01 BTC. This is about a $0.03 USD transaction fee for transactions under $3.30.

My solution to these limitations is to trade BTC on a distributed, low-transaction fee, fast confirming exchange.

That is why today I launched a BTC to Stellar gateway for my p2p microlending startup at https://onecred.com

I expect to see a lot of things people never imagined were possible once bitcoin's store of value combines with a distributed exchange that is good at the things that consumers need (speed, low fees, security, decentralization).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: