Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jamwise's commentslogin

I appreciate the attention to efficiency and avoiding bloat. As a frequent audacity user I'm thinking I might end up using this for a lot of simpler tasks.

That said the web offers such great techniques to maintain this. Passive loading of plugins for example could keep things snappy and light and load things when you need them.

If you want the perspective of a prospective long term user: I'd be very comfortable using your app even at tens of megabytes. You could probably keep your initial load pretty light but pull in larger modules as needed. There are certain effects and audio layering I often use in Audacity that would keep me there, but your modern interface and browser access are huge selling points. If your vision includes moving to a bigger editor I guarantee you you'll find a huge base who wouldn't even notice megabytes of code.


All very good points, not much to say I agree with you. With loading plugins on demand it could grow in size without affecting load and experience (and since offline mode is a separate link that would still be fine to be a little larger since it's fetching the app locally).

That'll depend on which way public sentiment goes

My favourite is Allbirds that pivoted from eco friendly shoes to AI infrastructure. How do you even make that decision?

It's not really a pivot though, is it? As I understand it, the company went bust and sold their branding to a different company that wants to do AI infra.

What I saw somewhere, don't know if it's true or a rumour, was that it was a wallstreet guy offering them $5M for if he could shift the strategy. So be bought a _lot_ of shares of the very cheap pre-pivot price, paid them $5M for the pivot, sold the shares at the now 600% stock increase. Netted a tidy profit after the $5M.

They didn't trade company fundamentals, they traded the market sentiment.


a.k.a. textbook bubble behavior

Didn’t even sell the branding since that got sold to the same company that buys up all sorts of brands. The ai “pivot” was a blatant last ditch effort to milk some of the stock. It’s nothing more than fraud.

Branding not used for its intended purpose is about as useful as calling your landscaping company four seasons.

To be clear, everything about Allbirds including the brand name and other IP was sold off. The shoe store will continue operating (unless or perhaps until the new owners choose to shut it down) under the name "Allbirds"; the public company doing AI infra with the stock ticker BIRD will be named "NewBird AI".

why not Aibirds then, it's almost like Allbirds?

They didn't pivot. Their company is worthless, they sold whatever meager assets were left until they were left with only their name, and then they made an AI investment announcement to pump and dump their stock.

They should make an app that can identify any bird. Then they will be able to justify it: we always wanted to live up to our name, the shoes were a side quest.

We live in an age when a guy who designed overblown mass-market "luxury" handbags and zero tech industry experience ends up in charge of software and hardware UX at the world's most successful mobile and computer hardware company. And be grossly incompetent, but still manage to last nearly a decade.

So.... Who's is it then?

Are you referring to Joanie or Alan Dye? I still can’t understand why an adult chose to go by Joanie in their professional career.

Don’t believe his lies, Jony rhymes with bony, Jonny rhymes with bonny.


Yeah, human minds need an security patch for firehosing

But the repo has had fairly consistent commits since then. Not huge activity, but not sure I'd call it dead.

There goes a 9

I've had some really gnarly SVGs from Claude. Here's what I got after many iterations trying to draw a hand: https://imgur.com/a/X4Jqius


Probably because all the training material of humans drawing hands are garbage haha.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: