I have to disagree, I find Groklaw extremely biased as well. It just happens that the bias seems to fit with your personal biases as well, so it appears like good coverage. This was especially true during Samsung vs. Apple, or with anything to do with Microsoft, or with defending Motorola's abuse of FRAND patents.

Groklaw had a clear bias and that could be corrected for. Their clear explanation of legal minutiae such that even a layman could understand it, and their attention to detail is why I follower their coverage.

I do not believe there is a completely unbiased source of news, No true Scotsman and all that...

I remember Groklaw actually sorting his technical understanding and personal bias.

s/his/her/g

Groklaw may have had a bias but you could always tell where Paula (?) was coming from and she doesn't appear to have taken money from anyone involved in the cases.

Other bloggers on the other hand seem very biased, are paid to consult on this stuff and don't disclose who's paying them for what.

I still don't understand the logic of how folding up shop was anything but signaling defeat.

Florian, is that you?

Is this one of the first malware to run on a Chromebook?

You could run dirty extensions on chromebooks from day one.