I'm a bit confused what you mean. I have to use GitLab for work and don't see much difference. Some UI elements look a bit more complex than on GH but other than that it's working the same way. Less buggy as well.
Personally I host forgejo for my private apps and have had no issues with that either.
Not surprising that the content on the site is AI generated, just surprised OP did not proof read. What is battle-tested in this context? Are the applied rules battle tested? Maybe? Is the skill battle-tested? Doubt it.
What does this have to do with Tauri? Besides, that's apples to oranges. Zed has a lot more features, if you don't want that then Sublime is a better pick.
> frizlab: […] while Zed is nice, Sublime is better.
> ramon156: What does this have to do with Tauri?
Not @OP but I imagine they are thinking: “because Zed is built on top of Tauri and Sublime Text is not.” Sublime Text’s user interface is built on top of a mix of (native) UI renderers for each major OS [1], mostly based on Google’s 2D graphics library: Skia https://skia.org/ . Recent versions (v3) go even lower: Vulkan and OpenGL https://www.sublimetext.com/blog/articles/hardware-accelerat...
Wait, what, Zed is Tauri? How?
One of their main things was that they implemented the UI layer completely from scratch using their own GPU-accelerated rendering engine.
It's got none of that browser-type stuff.
Yes you've posted this project multiple times now. Its slightly misleading, because there's not a full company behind it, but only one dude. Its self-hosting LibreOffice iirc.
The project itself is fine, I'm sure some people want this, but its getting annoying to see this every week, and its even more annoying how not transparent the website is about the company's situation.
> The phone in your pocket has roughly one million times more memory than the computer running Voyager 1.
I know both things are almost entirely unrelated, but I sometimes wonder how much more perf you could squeeze out of a phone if Android wasn't doing so much stuff in the background. Granted I do not know enough about the inner workings.
Android does a lot less stuff in the background than it used to.
Initially there were no limitations at all, your app could just do whatever, you ask to start a service, the system runs it for you no questions asked, only kills it if a foreground app needs memory, and then restarts it whenever possible.
Modern Android is very strict about this sort of thing in comparison. You only run something in the background if you have a good reason to, and you better display a notification while it's running. Background processes that try to do stuff in the background without telling the system are killed and throttled aggressively.
I think he was referring to things the OS does, rather than apps running in the background. My computer is under nearly full load when I start MS Windows and let it be "idle". (I run 10 IoT Enterprise so there is less bloat than typically, I also already tried to disable stuff I could find.) When I start my GNU/Linux OS it is truly idle and I can do video processing or compile stuff with hundreds of translation units in parallel.
reply