Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | synotna's commentslogin

Part of the struggle is that renewables have state aid exceptions, enabling massive taxpayer funded subsidisation of the """industry"""

> are people running energy generators

In Germany's case it's the tax payer, thanks to extremely generous subsidies that are excluded from state aid regulation


For dmarc purposes it is moving to DNS, with dmarcbis the psd tag and treewalk will replace hoping everybody uses the same file and keeps it up to date


OCSP is deprecated for CRLs

Let's encrypt already EOLd OCSP


Congrats on the launch

Please consider fixing that middle click opens in a new tab


Because Australia is not in the north Atlantic


New/improved rail links are planned/in progress as part of TEN-T which will probably help

https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/infrastructu... https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/infrastructu...


There is a very good book that covers it very well: the great post office scandal

Hard to read without boiling your blood


Cheers!


The predecessor to the UK before Ireland was the Kingdom of Great Britain, so would be correct to go back to afterwards

Of course to save money (and face) it probably wouldn't


United Kingdom came from the GB+Ireland, not England & Scotland

England + Scotland were the Kingdom of Great Britain


Ah good point, but the scenario in question involved both Ireland and Scotland leaving so "Great Britain" doesn't fit either.


If both leave, then the predecessor to the Kingdom of Great Britain was the Kingdom of England

Wales was already part of England, as principality / having been conquered

Though "United Kingdom of England" could argue that they kept the Irish crown :)


I feel like "Kingdom of England" would be off the table - you probably wouldn't want to antagonise the Welsh immediately after they just watched NI and Scotland split off :)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: