Damn my dead YC startup didn’t even make it into the graveyard

Spotify api also requires extension requests now. The review process takes 10+ weeks and has no discourse :(

Thats a localization issue perhaps, see https://openai.com/policies/privacy-policy

I agree in the short term it is a tool to enhance people and increases social mobility. The concern is after AGI the human assistance may become unnecessary

SEEKING FREELANCER | Remote | Full Stack Web3 Generalist

We are onboarding a full stack generalist to work on various client facing gigs at Juice. We are a web3 studio that specializes in NFTs, upgradeable / modular smart contracts.

High level technologies used:

- Typescript - Solidity - Ethers.js - AWS

https://juicelabs.io

contact: zac@juicelabs.io

What a malicious human assisted by AI could do is pretty crazy too. We are giving every Joe Shmo access to super intelligence.

It's it a little classist to concern yourself with "Joe Shmo"? What it is that Joe is going to do that's any worse for him than what Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Paul Bulcke (Chairman of Nestle), or Nils Andersen (Chairman of Unilever) isn't already doing?

How is an actual AI (not what we see today, but actual AI) more scary than the headless and amoral (not immoral, but amoral) organizations we have built today?

Was not intending to sound classist. Joe Shmo can be anyone Elon included.

For me it’s a question of whether the technology is potentially dangerous.

If it is, then having it in more peoples hands increases the probability of harm.

Maybe the fact that more people try it, it's more likely that we surface issues early?

It certainly is an arms race between accountability and advances. Whether it's even, we don't really know.

I'm not convinced, and neither are people who are a lot more knowledgable than me.

For instance, https://towardsdatascience.com/openais-chief-scientist-claim...

Apologies for the appeal to authority / not so relevant comment here, was writing this on too little sleep it seems.

Re-reading the next day like ???

Fair point on sensationalism, I think it's a useful hook to get folks reading and talking.

There is a "Nuance" section at the bottom where I qualify most of the rah rah language.

That being said, I disagree that it is that far from actually working. Check out the codex demo here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGUCcjHTmGY&ab_channel=OpenA... This is a year old and we've made a lot of progress since then.

The model is certainly capable of writing non pseudo-code, although I started hitting rate limits before I got it all the way there in my example.

Edit (typos)