> "parasitic gate capacitance" - not sure if you want to call it "parasitic", after all, a gate capacitance is what makes everything work!
Of course, but the 'ideal' FET has zero gate capacitance, despite that being the way they work.
> Power is mainly lost via leakage (the smaller the transistor, the more it leaks), and via interconnect capacitance, which dominates all other capacitances in modern circuits.
Interconnect meaning things like the buses? There's no reason to want a von Neumann architecture for an analog chip. If that leaves leakage, I suppose an analog chip would be the beneficiary of needing a lot fewer transistors per op.
'ideal' FET has zero gate capacitance, despite that being the way they work.
I don't understand this statement. What do you mean? A FET is a capacitor (gate to channel). If a gate has no capacitance, you have no transistor.
Interconnect means wire. This has nothing to do with von Neumann architecture. If you have wires in your circuit, then you have wire capacitance. As transistors get smaller, that capacitance starts to dominate internal transistor capacitances.
Of course, but the 'ideal' FET has zero gate capacitance, despite that being the way they work.
> Power is mainly lost via leakage (the smaller the transistor, the more it leaks), and via interconnect capacitance, which dominates all other capacitances in modern circuits.
Interconnect meaning things like the buses? There's no reason to want a von Neumann architecture for an analog chip. If that leaves leakage, I suppose an analog chip would be the beneficiary of needing a lot fewer transistors per op.