>but you are licensing it to them under their terms (currently CC, potentially MIT).
I see, thanks.
I wish I was told about this issue (and the current potential license migration) by SO. Instead I had to come here to read about a change that will be applied, and due to my low number of points on the site, not have my voice heard.
SO might want to give the appearance of some friendly "democratic" place, but the "this thread has been closed for being off topic" and crap like this license debate has really turned me off.
If they cared about the users, "meta" would not be so hidden away as it is, and certainly not issues like this - yet apparently the choosing of a new moderator by vote (glorified ego contest) is enough to send me notifications about.
What a joke; I can't wait for a better site to come along.
The discussion linked here is linked to on every single question page, question list, and homepage of Stack Overflow. And the same for every other site on Stack Exchange.
I see, thanks.
I wish I was told about this issue (and the current potential license migration) by SO. Instead I had to come here to read about a change that will be applied, and due to my low number of points on the site, not have my voice heard.
SO might want to give the appearance of some friendly "democratic" place, but the "this thread has been closed for being off topic" and crap like this license debate has really turned me off.
If they cared about the users, "meta" would not be so hidden away as it is, and certainly not issues like this - yet apparently the choosing of a new moderator by vote (glorified ego contest) is enough to send me notifications about.
What a joke; I can't wait for a better site to come along.