> This is nice, but only hardcore Lisp users prefer writing C-in-sexpr's to just writing C.
I object! The choice between this and straight C isn't completely up to personal preference; using s-expressions gives you objectively more power because it lends itself to lisp macros, which are really the strongest reason to use any lisp at all.
I think he's suggesting that you could add the same functionality using lisp as a preprocessor without having to write what is objectively C semantics weapped in s-exps.
I object! The choice between this and straight C isn't completely up to personal preference; using s-expressions gives you objectively more power because it lends itself to lisp macros, which are really the strongest reason to use any lisp at all.