Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Completely dishonest title and first 1,000 words of the write-up. That's when you get to the words:

> pointed out that Stockfish's methodology requires it to have an openings book for optimal performance.

I went from amazed, utter shock like "What!! No way. This is unreal. This is absolutely unreal. What? What? What?" to a total feeling that I've been reading 1,000 words of fake news.

I feel cheated by this write-up and flagged it for this reason. They need to mention it in the first couple of words, not after selling that it has deduced 1600 years of human chess knowledge in 4 hours.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: