> If your priorities are changing every two weeks, then you have no priorities.
Nonsense. Two weeks is - or should be - plenty of time to make a useful improvement to your product.
> The point was that employes are not aware they have priorities wrong. They are not asking, because they all assume they know what to do.
So fix that problem. Make sure they know when they should be asking about priorities. Don't just saturate them with priority information, that will annoy the ones who knew when to ask, and the ones who think they know won't pay attention anyway.
> If you have same sudden problem fifteenth time, then it is not change. If all of your projects end in crunch surprisingly and none of your plans work, you are doing it wrong.
If most of your plans succeed, you are not taking the risks that you need to make the big wins.
Nonsense. Two weeks is - or should be - plenty of time to make a useful improvement to your product.
> The point was that employes are not aware they have priorities wrong. They are not asking, because they all assume they know what to do.
So fix that problem. Make sure they know when they should be asking about priorities. Don't just saturate them with priority information, that will annoy the ones who knew when to ask, and the ones who think they know won't pay attention anyway.
> If you have same sudden problem fifteenth time, then it is not change. If all of your projects end in crunch surprisingly and none of your plans work, you are doing it wrong.
If most of your plans succeed, you are not taking the risks that you need to make the big wins.