Shares are often a much more tax efficient way of rewarding employees and having an actual share has numerous advantage's in term of morale retention and so on.
Also shares keep on producing income after you have left a company.
“Also shares keep on producing income after you have left a company.”
If I was making $120k per year working at MailChimp the last thing I would want is 30% or more of my net worth tied up in private shares. What employee wants that much exposure? It’s a private tech company with no plans for liquidity potentially ever.
It is severely limiting. You can’t sell private shares on the open market to buy a condo, pay off college debt, invest in your own company, quit and travel the world, etc. It could be decades before you receive the full share value. If hypothetical employee is working full time it’s probably because they don’t have enough assets 2M+ to live off passive income and need to work. Let’s say they are frugal and save $40k per year. If you have comp like a public co and receive $40k+ per year in shares does it really make sense to have 50%+ of your net worth in a single private tech company? It would probably work out great but 10 years is a long time to wait. I’m pretty sure there is issues with tax too but I don’t know the math.
Shares are worthless unless you can convert them to something. If the company is not public or doesn't have a secondary market, you're just getting paper money that you can never spend. Morale will definitely tank once people figure that out.
Also shares keep on producing income after you have left a company.