Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not sure to what extent I believe this.

There are a lot of overlapping distinctions, some blurry, I think. He chooses some for wizardry vs engineering but I don't know whether they're best. For example he puts "magic"=implicit, but I would normally say highly implicit code is "engineering" because it implies that someone has understood and explored the problem enough to write a very tuned framework or library. I think reasons for putting very implicit code in with wizardry could be that it might be that the person using it doesn't understand it, and that it's somewhat in opposition to strong typesystems

wizardry/engineering high uptime/downtime possible efficiency important/efficiency not important large codebase/small codebase not implicit/implicit (I disagree most with this one) problem is understood/code is exploratory (I think this is the most important distinction) high specialism/low specialism of coders changes slowly/changes quickly typed/untyped

I would say websites are engineering because the problem space is well understood, they need high uptime and they tend to be written by specialists (React guy, django guy etc).



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: