I think it's helpful to know where our technology came from for multiple reasons. (It's also fun learning to me, too.)
Knowing what came before makes us better at building new (or, even better, recognizing that we might not need to build new). Our creations would frequently benefit from application of knowledge about the analogous systems that came before. There's nothing new under the sun. There is valuable analogy hiding in so many past technologies.
I want to know about trade-offs made during design, how that influenced implementation, and the lessons that were learned when the technology actually made it (or didn't make it) into use. Decisions made so many years ago shaped the technology we use today (von Neumann vs. Harvard architecture, the minutiae of compatibility in x86 and the IBM PC that dates back all the way to the early Intel 8-bit CPUs the IBM 5150, etc).
I think software, hardware, and protocol "archaeology" are going to become more necessary as more of the people who implemented early systems that are still in use today die. So, besides being interesting, I think there's a marketable skill in the act of being able to build understanding of past technology.
Knowing what came before makes us better at building new (or, even better, recognizing that we might not need to build new). Our creations would frequently benefit from application of knowledge about the analogous systems that came before. There's nothing new under the sun. There is valuable analogy hiding in so many past technologies.
I want to know about trade-offs made during design, how that influenced implementation, and the lessons that were learned when the technology actually made it (or didn't make it) into use. Decisions made so many years ago shaped the technology we use today (von Neumann vs. Harvard architecture, the minutiae of compatibility in x86 and the IBM PC that dates back all the way to the early Intel 8-bit CPUs the IBM 5150, etc).
I think software, hardware, and protocol "archaeology" are going to become more necessary as more of the people who implemented early systems that are still in use today die. So, besides being interesting, I think there's a marketable skill in the act of being able to build understanding of past technology.