Agreed. Absolutely stunning how so many comments make insane claims with no knowledge about what they're talking about.
> I honestly would not be surprised if the difference in effectiveness of targeted vs untargeted advertisement turns out to be none
> What if I told you the NYT has been doing "untargeted" advertising for 150 years? Besides if you advertise in the NYT you ARE technically targeting people
> advertising is the art of fooling oneselves first about the source of success and then fooling others
> Why would any premium website even agree to ads that track users?
> I honestly would not be surprised if the difference in effectiveness of targeted vs untargeted advertisement turns out to be none
> What if I told you the NYT has been doing "untargeted" advertising for 150 years? Besides if you advertise in the NYT you ARE technically targeting people
> advertising is the art of fooling oneselves first about the source of success and then fooling others
> Why would any premium website even agree to ads that track users?