>as I look through her history I am mostly confused why she was chosen in the first place. She doesn't have any background in tech. She doesn't have any prior writing or research related to AI. No background in the other topics that come up - surveillance, data privacy, international security.
Is this true for any other board members? Have journalists been focusing only on Kay, or did they do due diligence into the others?
>as I look through her history I am mostly confused why she was chosen in the first place. She doesn't have any background in tech. She doesn't have any prior writing or research related to AI. No background in the other topics that come up - surveillance, data privacy, international security.
Is this true for any other board members? Have journalists been focusing only on Kay, or did they do due diligence into the others?