> our understanding of the commerce clause had changed. Today we would say that everything is interstate commerce
...
> (To be clear, I disagree strongly with the decision, which I think was deeply misguided.)
A worthwhile step on the path of disagreement is to separate your perspective from the Supreme Court's. "Our understanding" has not changed - the Supreme Court has merely crafted a tenuous justification for more government power. Which is not surprising given that the Supreme Court is part of the government, thus directly benefiting from increasing that power.
...
> (To be clear, I disagree strongly with the decision, which I think was deeply misguided.)
A worthwhile step on the path of disagreement is to separate your perspective from the Supreme Court's. "Our understanding" has not changed - the Supreme Court has merely crafted a tenuous justification for more government power. Which is not surprising given that the Supreme Court is part of the government, thus directly benefiting from increasing that power.