Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

RAR was great at the time because it offered "solid" archiving like a tar/gz combo. Zip and ARJ both compressed at the file level rather than the archive level.


> Zip and ARJ both compressed at the file level rather than the archive level.

No. You may be thinking of gzip, a spiritual successor and replacement for the Unix compress/uncompress (and even earlier pack/unpack).

But both ZIP and ARJ, and the earlier ARC, all made multiple-file archives.

Or did you mean that the compression was “carried over” from file to file inside the archive?


The latter.


And now, IMHO, it is great because of its Fastest mode - it is really fast and at the same time compresses quite well.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: