I think you misunderstood my comment. The parent was saying:
>Imagine that in the real world. I honestly expect it to become commonplace - by entering our store, you agree to the terms posted in the binder you may ask to view.
My point to this was that it isn't that much of a far-fetched scenario, as it already happens with "no guns on store premises" signs in my state. You consent to the arbitrary rule by entering the store. I bet it is already backed up by state law (not sure 100%, but I believe so), just like it is in Texas (I am in WA), so I agree with you.
>Imagine that in the real world. I honestly expect it to become commonplace - by entering our store, you agree to the terms posted in the binder you may ask to view.
My point to this was that it isn't that much of a far-fetched scenario, as it already happens with "no guns on store premises" signs in my state. You consent to the arbitrary rule by entering the store. I bet it is already backed up by state law (not sure 100%, but I believe so), just like it is in Texas (I am in WA), so I agree with you.