Ideology aside, what's the point? Like the article quotes, "if you are a company that gives away your product - how the hell are you supposed to justify paying for such a license when there is a perfectly good alternative that doesn't cost you money?"
Do you know how many engineers Mozilla can get for $5 million a year? Or how many ads they can buy for $5 million? Or how much beer? The point is- just because they have the money doesn't mean this is a good way to spend it.
Do you know how many engineers Mozilla can get for $5 million a year? Or how many ads they can buy for $5 million? Or how much beer? The point is- just because they have the money doesn't mean this is a good way to spend it.