That's a fair argument. Allow to counter this with: how much of this modern economy do we need ?

- high distance vs local

- high output ? (we waste 30% of food, have tons of electronic waste too)

- high frequency vs calm

I'm not trying to troll you, I'm really asking people to consider how much of this feverish economy we need.

If we cut fossil fuel for most and keep it for those with too low solar input, how would be our current society ?

It annoys me to know end when people consider the world as a fixed absolute best. Especially since there are clearly flaws.