So your statement does not invalidate the original point.
But I feel like you're pointlessly nitpicking, which is against the hn rules, so please read those.
And my comment addresses that.
Instead, it would be nit picking to say "well, actually, some laws do apply, and since you said all laws accidentally, that makes you wrong!".
In reality, whatever actions the Tesla car in question did, might not be illegal because some laws might not apply.
The original point, that maybe the Tesla car didn't do anything illegal, could be true.
If a Tesla car was driving around a parking lot in the wrong direction it definitely looks like some of those listed e.g. careless, reckless or improper driving would cover it.
So yes there is a good case to be made that it's illegal.
So your statement does not invalidate the original point.