Why would the author include that when it's not in their best interests? In the disclosures they clearly state they are financially biased towards TSLA's failure. It's little more than a hit piece intended to influence their stock price downwards so the author will make money.

Hopefully they give practical advice based on relevant observations to build trust with their readership. This particular article does the opposite.

I get that they have a motive to slam Tesla, but shoddy articles don't install confidence in their brand.