What good intentions? That quoted FAQ walked around the core point: advertising is, for the most part, exploiting.
> So, a user browsing for information on a benefits webpage might be shown ads relevant for people on a budget, like for reduced price travel or supermarket price cuts on everyday items or a comparison website to find the best tariff on gas and electricity.
Or payday loans, or get-rich-quick schemes, or gambling, or news articles about how the elite is oppressing them, or "save your money on power bill by bundling it with your mobile service" borderline scams.
It's not like the government, or the company that wrote that FAQ, will be actively filtering the ads to ensure that only the honest win-win deals are shown.
> So, a user browsing for information on a benefits webpage might be shown ads relevant for people on a budget, like for reduced price travel or supermarket price cuts on everyday items or a comparison website to find the best tariff on gas and electricity.
Or payday loans, or get-rich-quick schemes, or gambling, or news articles about how the elite is oppressing them, or "save your money on power bill by bundling it with your mobile service" borderline scams.
It's not like the government, or the company that wrote that FAQ, will be actively filtering the ads to ensure that only the honest win-win deals are shown.