Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why is a technology that makes shoes faster at the expense of their durability something that will the average joe’s life “better, more efficient”? That’s quite the claim.

If technology doesn’t improve (and maybe decreases) affordability, barrier to entry, or safety, why is it better? because it’s more performant in competition? It just seems like inflation to me.



I think it is good because first they prove a technology is possible then as it is improved over time things like durability and cost can be tackled.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: