Yes, how sad that incorrect facts will no longer stand unquestioned...
If I'm wrong I like being corrected. It means I learn something. Of course if I think the correction is incorrect then things get a bit more complex and a longer discussion will ensue.
Also, if they're false it should be easy to correct them.
Anyone who thinks about this for more than 20 seconds will see that this is about control, not protecting poor Twitter users who supposedly can't decide for themselves.
Unfortunately many will read and forward the original post, and be ignorant (sometimes deliberately so) of any corrections.
Looking at it the other way: if responding with corrections is so powerful why not just respond to the post with a "potential misinformation" warning with a correction, perhaps citing sources that show the information to be correct? In fact citing sources in the first place could remove the problem entirely if the information is verifiably correct that way.
> this is about control
Correct: controlling the spread of misinformation.
> not protecting poor Twitter users who supposedly can't decide for themselves
No, it is trying to protect twitter users who won't think for themselves.
If I'm wrong I like being corrected. It means I learn something. Of course if I think the correction is incorrect then things get a bit more complex and a longer discussion will ensue.