Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

One of the reasons LinkedIn's share price jumped so high from its IPO price of $45 was because of a very low float. There are too few LinkedIn shares trading on the public market. It is not that easy to get your hands on LinkedIn shares right now, even if you are willing to pay market price. This artificially raises the stock price.

I believe 7 million shares were floated out of ~94 million outstanding shares. If more shares are floated, the price per share should go down (not considering other factors) as there will be a larger supply of shares in the public market. The assessment that the investment banks that the IPO should be priced at $45 sounds more reasonable had all 94 million shares been floated (speaking hypothetically; this never actually happens).

For this reason, valuing LinkedIn by multiplying 94 million (total outstanding shares) by the current stock price on the NYSE (as most news articles have been doing) is probably not a very accurate measure.



But that would mean that the investors didn't know how to do math. Everybody that buys knows what percentage of the company they're supposedly are overpaying for.


There are too few LinkedIn shares trading on the public market. It is not that easy to get your hands on LinkedIn shares right now, even if you are willing to pay market price. This artificially raises the stock price.

Not really true. If you want to buy or sell a million shares right now, you're probably going to see that effect-- it's called "slippage" and occurs when you trade any stock in large quantity, but the market self-corrects soon after. At a few hundred or thousand shares for a decently liquid stock, slippage is not a real concern and the only cost of trading is the bid-ask spread, which is usually a penny or two.


Someone's wrong on the internet...must avoid spending time correcting them




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: