It’s a generous interpretation, but using prioritization to determine how best to help feels at least roughly accurate. We are, as a society right now, being pretty explicit about who we think is most valuable.
The plan is to actually have the job and its duties and fit in the classification. I dont want it to be counterproductive if I can also just wait. So there exists some essential worker jobs that dont really include being surrounded by aerosol spores all day.
I was asked what other interpretations could be and provided one. I wasn’t suggesting this was your intention, in fact I explained how it probably wasn’t in my comment directly prior.
there exists retail [essential worker] jobs that don’t currently expose you to alot of people
and would fit the categorizations created by the state
the same goes for health care professionals or education workers
surprising to see how much the consensus here is grasping. newsflash remote tech workers, you dont have to keep the same job or only one job and your circumstance may not actually be privileged
"triggered" ? I would have used "confused" but that choice of words seals the deal for me. also newsflash omitting capital letters and final stop don't make you sound cool good luck
