Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> all I saw was a wall of vague text from a cardboard cut, predatory sensationalists, all cross referencing each other

I assure you his FBI file - https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/fbi... - is not vague, predatory, sensationalist, and does not cross-reference any discussion you may find on the web today.

His ex-wife reportedly testified that on several occasions when she unwittingly disturbed either his calculus or his drums he flew into a violent rage, during which time he attacked her, threw pieces of bric-a-brac about and smashed the furniture.

Feynman's autobiographical writings about women are also disgusting enough by modern standards.

I don't understand why you would think having developed an excellent physics course is incompatible with that (or vice versa).



what do you think would be the worst, most shocking revelation in your own 300pages long FBI file? especially one that includes a deposition from a former spouse who was seeking divorce settlement at the time, plus depositions of everyone you broke up with? i can only speak for myself, but my hypothetical file would have made considerably more interesting read than feyman's


You could take issue with the accuracy or provenance of the file (which we can then discuss if you actually do rather than merely insinuate you could) but nonetheless it is none of "vague text from a cardboard cut, predatory sensationalists, all cross referencing each other" which is what you originally claimed.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: