Not because they have guns, because they use guns.
> ...and has been shown to literally kil.
The argument is much more complete if you finish the sentence.
Police kill to get their way. Its not their job to kill. People should not get killed by police. In the case of this article, the court literally told the police to leave the press alone... then they corral the press and intimidate them .
The argument is that police pointing guns (which they actively use!) at the press (who are reporting on a protest centering around police over-use of deadly force) is not comparable in the sense that "both have done wrong".
The argument is much more complete if you finish the sentence.
Police kill to get their way. Its not their job to kill. People should not get killed by police. In the case of this article, the court literally told the police to leave the press alone... then they corral the press and intimidate them .
The argument is that police pointing guns (which they actively use!) at the press (who are reporting on a protest centering around police over-use of deadly force) is not comparable in the sense that "both have done wrong".