WebP offers basically no advantage over good ol’ JPG in lossy compression of photos, which was the use case for this site.
I hear you on Core Web Vitals, but most sites will have a long list of more impactful changes to make before they could expect to see any measurable rank improvement by switching from JPG to WebP for photos.
I hear you on Core Web Vitals, but most sites will have a long list of more impactful changes to make before they could expect to see any measurable rank improvement by switching from JPG to WebP for photos.