Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Apple specifically avoids code licensed under GPL 3, which wasn't even released at the time Carmack's code was licensed.

The concern there seems to be the anti-"tivoization" provisions, which could force Apple to allow people to replace GPLv3'd code.



I believe the concern was more about the patent closes from the GPLv3




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: