Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No, its like saying they should not be allowed to serve expired food and let x% of people end up sick. They should either serve safe to eat food or no food at all.


to continue the analogy; idk if dying from starvation is worse than dying from food-poisoning (quantitative and qualitative).

moot point anyways, as google is not (yet) in the business of essential services. they can hand out literal shit and it's totally fine.


> idk if dying from starvation is worse than dying from food-poisoning

It would have to be a major emergency to warrant that, food-wise. Under normal circumstances, no danger food.

> moot point anyways, as google is not (yet) in the business of essential services. they can hand out literal shit and it's totally fine.

Google is more like the store giving out free samples. It's not essential at all but it definitely has to be safe.


Google is giving out free samples that it’s representing as full service.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: