I'm currently experiencing some scalability issues as you might have noticed. The machine I deployed on is limited to 128mb. But Joyent is actively resolving it.
Yes I noticed that as well, but I found that the name observer really suited this service. But I'm still searching for alternate names to avoid potential confusion.
Looks nice. You need to clean up the homepage blurb though and there are just a few spelling errors (changed sections are in italics):
Observer allows you to follow and observe your website visitors in real time. Ever wondered what they were clicking on or how they are navigating on your website? Then Observer is ideal for you, it's a 1 script installation and you are done.
Thanks for pointing out my grammer mistakes. English isn't my native language so I was hoping that vim's build in spelling check would fix most of the issues.
I have corrected the spelling mistakes and they should appear online soon when the cache expires. (luckily I decided to build in a small mongodb driven cms during the contest so I could fix these silly mistakes)
I'd freak out if that second example from the feature-list would happen to me while I was browsing some site.
"Hello I see you are having issues finding the 'free account' button?"
...
"are you spying on me?"
edit: ok, maybe not "freak out" but i'd certainly feel at unease. Specially if it was a site enabling some form of PIM/im/private-ish activity.
This is really incredible. Im testing it out with my sites and this is groundbreaking. Expect great things V1, im almost speechless. I need a guy like you on my startup!!!
Yes I plan to continue development of this application after the competition, there are still some rough edges that needs to be fixed. So I see this a great working prototype to iterate on.
My JS says
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://observer.no.de/deploy/observer.js#{observer:undefined...;
Is 'undefined' correct? Seems wrong. :(