Yikes. Go take your assumptions and discuss with idiots that fall for your flame bait. I am out.
The paper is just bogus science or at the least misinterpreted facts, inflammation is a factor in menstrual cycle changes this is present for most if not all vaccines https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16403011/
You are even worse than some facebook moms researchers, max. two pages down on google. Because you actually believe you ate it by the spoonful. No, idea about the subject. No, idea how to search and interpret scientific papers. Just CTRL+F, CTRL+C and CTRL+V. Like the junior dev in the meeting after he googled what's on the chart "but actually...". The nih granted 1.67 mil to other scientist who are doing the peer review now. You can find it by searching and you can even get the preprints. You can do it yourself maybe you'll learn something from it. causation vs correlation.
> Peer reviews are not available, as the Editors completed an expedited review using peer reviews from another journal
What peer reviews dismissed most of the study? Is it more than some blogger disagreeing with the outcome?