Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> (eg. quarantine not required when traveling to some countries, and your example)

For policies like quarantine following travel does it make any sense to distinguish anyone whether they have had covid, had a vaccine, had both a vaccine and covid, or had neither a vaccine or covid? Aren’t all of the above equally capable of carrying and transmitting the virus?



That's what I would think, but apparently Malaysia for example really wants people to have recovered from COVID specifically.


About everyone will get it sooner or later, vaccinated or not. (Pets are a reservoir, and nobody is vaccinating them.)

The best to hope for is not to die, be hospitalized, or suffer various long-term or permanent effects. Vaccination is all we have to prevent those.


Yes, but measures like the policies in question encourage people to get infected with symptomatic COVID so that they could go to doctor and get that very useful piece of paper.

That's the point. If you wanted to ensure people to not get COVID, do not give those who have had COVID pleasant exemptions. They failed, they should not be rewarded.


If everyone will get it, then no one who gets it and does not die or become seriously inconvenienced has failed. Dying, of course, is usually a fail, but literally everyone will do that, too.


I thought the last one on the list (neither vaccine nor covid) has a higher chance of carrying covid.


In general they are more susceptible to becoming infected and once infected they have higher risk of negative outcomes.


Yeah, that's my point. Because they are more susceptible to becoming infected, they're more likely to transmit the virus.


>Aren’t all of the above equally capable of carrying and transmitting the virus?

No. If I had Covid a month ago and recovered then baring a compromised immune system or new variant I am not going to get it again this month. So I am not "equally capable of carrying and transmitting the virus" compared to someone who "had neither a vaccine or covid".


> I am not going to get it again this month.

I understand that you would have antibodies and it be very unlikely if you carry the virus it would be unlikely to overwhelm your immune system in that time, but you can still carry/spread it right?

More directly related to the policy in question they can test you for antibodies, and maybe it is immaterial, but do they distinguish if you had covid 1 month ago vs 3 months vs 6 months? So does it work on the honor system or are they testing for antibodies, is it simply a matter of if you had covid at any point it doesn’t matter if you still carry antibodies you are not subject to quarantine?


Well it depends on your exposed viral load

Having anti-bodies reduces the viral load in your body, which also means that there are fewer viral fragments exiting your body

The policies are to reduce spread, not eliminate it


>but you can still carry/spread it right?

Once you have recovered? I don't think so, at least not if you have a healthy immune system.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: