Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The timing makes this more convincing.

If the leaker is someone who is outraged by the decision, why didn't they leak it in February when it was first circulated? Why wait until now?

Also, keep in mind that the final decision was going to be made public in June, several months before the midterm elections. That's next month -- the outrage was going to happen soon enough. Why jump the gun at such a late date, so close to when the decision was going to be public anyway?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: