I think the challenge here is that efficiency is always relative to the position the observer is measuring it from.
In the case of Gloria, she should have some amount of slack to figure out how to do the big picture items of her job better, which include how better to help Tony.
Where things get tricky is when looking at the whole organization there's been a long tendency to see "slack" as "fat" that's to be trimmed. So, if a organization has two Glorias who both have some slack time, the argument is the organization would be more efficient and profitable having one Gloria with less or no slack time.
This has worked for corporate profits, but it leads to the humans in these positions unable to have the slack time needed to improve those positions.
Sometimes, this is fine and you can build a very profitable business off of it. For example, McDonald's isn't looking for their frontline staff to do any thinking.
In general, if a position can exist and doesn't need "slack" time, it is probably a position that should be automated as soon as it's cost effective.
If you really need a human to do it though, you should stop trying to treat it like machine and realize the importance of slack time and build it in to the schedule.
> For example, McDonald's isn't looking for their frontline staff to do any thinking.
They tend to punish it. I say that I learned from fast food: how to mop a floor, how to remove burnt coffee, and the value of an education/career.
I think because they work with a lot of teenagers, they tend to get away with belittling people and getting because you’re two back-talks from fired, and you’re not sophisticated enough yet for the subtle burn they can’t write you up for.
“Give a man a little power” was never more clear to me. They have their little empire of dirt and they are going to defend it.
The biggest asshole had a brother who was a pro baseball player. As if what your brother does makes you important (my own brother hated that idea). Congratulations, you sell burgers all day. Your parents must be proud.
The best of them had a mild case of impostor syndrome he tried to cover. Told too many dad jokes, but still top 3 for managers in a clutch situation. I hope he did something with himself besides ace school field trips dropping in on us unannounced.
In the case of Gloria, she should have some amount of slack to figure out how to do the big picture items of her job better, which include how better to help Tony.
Where things get tricky is when looking at the whole organization there's been a long tendency to see "slack" as "fat" that's to be trimmed. So, if a organization has two Glorias who both have some slack time, the argument is the organization would be more efficient and profitable having one Gloria with less or no slack time.
This has worked for corporate profits, but it leads to the humans in these positions unable to have the slack time needed to improve those positions.
Sometimes, this is fine and you can build a very profitable business off of it. For example, McDonald's isn't looking for their frontline staff to do any thinking.
In general, if a position can exist and doesn't need "slack" time, it is probably a position that should be automated as soon as it's cost effective.
If you really need a human to do it though, you should stop trying to treat it like machine and realize the importance of slack time and build it in to the schedule.