If the cost of extraction rises due to oil and gas being more and more difficult to access (because it's limited, obviously), you could claim demand has peaked but it would still be due to production cost (i.e production peaking). "The Stone Age didn't end for lack of stone, and the oil age will end long before the world runs out of oil" (Ahmed Zaki Yamani, former SA Minister of Oil)
> We already have problems recycling blades from wind turbines and most are still not at the end of their lifespan.
> And never mind solar and wind still suck for base load management since we still lack cost effective energy storage that can scale at the grid level.
There have been articles for many decades now that we are reaching the peak of what can be pulled out of the ground. That we will simply run out of oil.
This is a lie. There is plenty of supply.
This is the argument op is making.
Whether to burn it or not is a different question.
The war may force Russia to sell their oil to non-Western countries but the crisis helped support oil price and made global investments in O&G profitable for them again (and for every other producers too). Just like with the war in Iraq - which explains why Putin did not oppose the US invasion for long after they realized it would bring enormous profits to Russia.
Are you claiming fossil fuels aren't limited? Also, oil peak is widely believed to have been reached already https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-world-has-already-passe...
If the cost of extraction rises due to oil and gas being more and more difficult to access (because it's limited, obviously), you could claim demand has peaked but it would still be due to production cost (i.e production peaking). "The Stone Age didn't end for lack of stone, and the oil age will end long before the world runs out of oil" (Ahmed Zaki Yamani, former SA Minister of Oil)
> We already have problems recycling blades from wind turbines and most are still not at the end of their lifespan.
Of course we have a problem recycling things when there are to few of these things to justify setting up an industry. It isn't because we can't recycle them: https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/11/30/fact...
>what do you do with all this crap a the end of it's 20 year lifespan?
They now last 25+ years: https://news.energysage.com/how-long-do-solar-panels-last/ and that's based on data from 2012.
> And never mind solar and wind still suck for base load management since we still lack cost effective energy storage that can scale at the grid level.
Then why does RTE (French national transmission system operator) have plans to switch to 100% renewables by 2050? https://www.rte-france.com/analyses-tendances-et-prospective...