In the first case (negligence) you were saving water.

On the second case you were trying to kill the plants.

Oh, so I can neglect the things as I wish in the name of saving proverbial water, and be free of all consequences at the end?

That's great.

Maybe we should try that.

Please increase your level of flexible thinking so you can understand the comparison made.

Thank you.

Maybe I understood what you have said, but intentionally showed how it can be abused by thinking in a too flexible manner?

Maybe we both should increase our flexibility in different perspectives.

Thank you, too.

:)

:)

Well, if you really wish to go that far we can do a philosophy doctorate. Find me on Libera.chat, nick qa6.