Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

  > .. otherwise this was a mute point.
"moot". Pretty please, the word is "moot."

Otherwise, while I think you've got a point (he could have used pricing to ensure no one ran his app), that isn't the issue here. The disclosure is. No one is contending he did something evil with his code, it's that Apple is mad about his code and disclosure. I don't think making it unlikely to be purchased would have helped.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: