Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What I hated about that book is that it's full of exercises (good!) but no answers are provided (bad!). I really don't understand the mentality behind providing such good exercises with no way to check your answers - and they're not the kind of problems that you can verify your answer to, either.


They have started providing some answers: https://mitp-content-server.mit.edu/books/content/sectbyfn/b...

There are other sources on the web with answers. For example, https://sites.math.rutgers.edu/~ajl213/CLRS/CLRS.html

Often you can find some solutions to problem sets on course pages that use the book.

I agree that it would be better to provide solutions, but not all textbooks are written to be used in self-study. I don't know enough about CS to offer up any concrete recommendations, but there are math books that come with worked problems (e.g., https://www.springer.com/series/3423) and other math books that don't have worked problems (https://www.springer.com/series/666).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: